I wasn't having a very good morning.
It's cold, I couldn't motivate myself to go for a run, I'm swamped at work, and my Vegemite-to-toast ratio was off.
Then I popped online to read the news, because I'm all topically relevant and hyper-informed and stuff.
And, in this story, I found the hands-down winner of Sentence Of The Year:
"Ms Tankard Reist said it was hard to talk about art restoring dignity when another image in the magazine showed a woman being fellated by an octopus".
My morning is made.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Was the octopus naked? I think this latest debate over child nudity and sexualization needs to be extended to consider other potential innocent victims. Who gave consent for the octopus to appear in such a context?
'sif you ever get down
I wasn't aware it was possible for a woman to be fellated, by either octopus or human.
...unless it's a case similar to that of America's 'pregnant man'...
I'm getting a headache just thinking about it.
...and those naughty octopusses, they are just all hands, love.
Brilliant surprise attack huh? There's the octopus, about to get jiggy and your all "ohhh boy, with all those arms I know what going to happen next!" and then BAM. Flips the switch.
Or maybe it's the "pus" reference. Fuck art's confusing.
Lol!
Post a Comment